Archive for the ‘Copyright’ Category

NYTimes on Interoperatiblity of Ebook Readers and Ebook Copyright

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Right on cue from the last post – this NYTimes article on interoperability of ebook readers and copyright protection for ebooks – check it out

Should Publishers Support DRM-free Ebooks?

Monday, August 24th, 2009

It seems authors and publishers are often at opposite ends of the tug of war between DRM ebooks and Open [DRM-free] Ebooks.
One such author struggled with his publisher over several months to have his books published DRM free. His reasons were typical of the two major hurdles faccing many other ebook authors:

Cost - this is largely a legacy issue through years of rather irrational pricing in the print publishing industry. Books seem to be largely priced on type of cover [hard or soft] and the number of page, and only then by the value of the content [if at all]. This same logic is being applied to ebooks – seen by many as having less intrinsic value than printed books. What nonsense – just because we have been doing it wrong for years, why should we continue now. Look at it this way. If we hire a professional or consultant to do some work for us, we evaluate their fees based on their knowledge and expertise, and the value we will derive from that. We don’t just evaluate them as one person per hour. Yet this is exactly how most people value books. All books are NOT equal. For example, the knowledge contained in a book like ‘The Logical Organization’. It’s a soft cover, 365 page book that retails at $USD79.95, but the content equates to hundreds of hours of consulting time and tens of thousands of dollars. Whether it is received as a print book or ebook is a personal preference of the reader. Myself, I am busy and travel a lot – I wouldn’t want to be lugging around TLO in my brief case. It wouldn’t fit anyway. But I can readily access it on my PDA or Kindle – and since it is a reference style book I can access it whenever I need to, wherever I am.

DRM - when you encrypt an e-book, DVD or computer game, you are immediately creating a relationship with your customer based on distrust. You don’t trust them. In reality – you don’t trust the low copyright laws of China or the fraudsters in Russia and Korea. Again, the logic is flawed. The normal customer is not going to rip off your ebook any more than lending a print book to a few friends. Copyright pirates and ebook theives will find a way to downloaded pirated copies anyway – they are much smarter at it than publishers, authors and readers combined. So the only people you are irritating are your so-called trusted paying public.

I hate DRM books – I can’t use them as I want, take notes out of them easily to reference quickly. Often, I can’t access it through more than one computer – yet I use 3 networked laptops at home, an ebook reader, PDA, PC and laptop at work. And I have to make sure I publish the password everywhere I go otherwise I forget it and can’t get back in!!! DRM-locked e-books will generally work with only one device, or one particular piece of software. No wonder print books are still preferred!!

Squidoo Ousts Junk Lenses

Sunday, June 21st, 2009

In a welcome move to clear the Internet of junk web pages, Squidoo is taking bold steps to rid its website of lenses that fail to meet certain quality standards.

To maintain the quality of their service and discourage IM spammers, Squidoo is introducing new quality standards aimed particularly at six key areas:

  1. IM Spammers creating hundred of lenses all pointing to the same domain
  2. X-rated lenses with Adult content
  3. Lenses focused on any spam hitting Squidoo or junk topics, with cited examples including movie downloads, Hoodia Gordoni, Acai berry reviews, LoseBellyFat!, Pharmaceuticals, Forex reports etc
  4. Overly sales promoted lenses
  5. Over zealous link building – with the maximum outbound links to a single domain to be restrictured to 9
  6. Lenses showing clear plagarism

The new standards are expected to be in play by end of July 2009,

For more details on the new Squidoo Policy
4 Things You Can Do Now to Tidy Up Your Squidoo Lens

3 Media Turnarounds in 3 Days

Friday, February 20th, 2009

Over the past few days there have been 3 signficant turnarounds in the media world in terms of privacy, copyright.

Facebook

Facebook, the social media site has over 175 million customers. And many of those were not happy with the user policy changes Facebook was about to implement. It seems the people have spoken, and Facebook has backed off, now looking for other ways resolve questions such as who controls the information shared on the social networking site.

The outburst was in reaction to Facebooks recent update of the policy which included statements that pretty well said Facebook could do whatever they wanted with your content, forever. Not going to happen, responded the users – tens of thousands joined protest groups on the site to voice their opposition.

Their current stance is that they do not claim right to user media, but need a license in order to help users share the media with their friends. Check out the “Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities” designed to let users give input on Facebook’s terms of use.

NZ Copyright Amendment Act Protest

Over the other side of the world, in New Zealand, protesters of the recently introduced Copyright Amendment Act, which comes into force on February 28, sported blank signs to symbolise that freedom of speech was being stifled by a copyright law and it should be dumped.

Section 92A of the law stipulates that any material subject to an accusation of breach of copyright is made even if it is not proven, will have to be removed from the internet. As it stands, ISPs may have to close down sites even if the complaint is malicious.

Some protesters have even blacked out their webpages as part of a week of action.
What happened to innocent until proven guilty….

Movie and Music Industry Mediation

And on to major media boardrooms, bosses of movie and music conglomerates have bosses pulled back from taking a hard stand in the battle between copyright holders and internet pirates and are instead considering engaging independent mediation to ease the tension between the typical hardline Hollywood approach and Telcos who are being forced to police copyright holders’ property rights.

Under section 92a of the Copyright Act, which comes into force at the end of the month, ISPs and any company operating a server to staff has to investigate complaints about internet piracy such as illegal downloads of music, TV shows and movies.

In a similar environment as NZ, the comms service providers are being tasked with removing clients from the web.